CD57 as a Marker of Immunological Aging, but Not Immune Cell Senescence
Even in this age of single cell sequencing, a great deal of the categorization and counting of cells is still accomplished via assessment of cell surface proteins. The ability to cheaply create and manufacture novel antibodies that selectively bind to specific proteins naturally led to technologies such as flow cytometry that can separate and count cells that express a specific surface protein, or high versus low levels of that surface protein. The large number of proteins with names that start with "CD" for cluster of differentiation are so named because researchers have spent a lot of time looking for ways to distinguish different populations of immune cells with very different behaviors.
Recognizing specific surface markers is also an important foundation for the development of cell killing technologies and immunotherapies. Thus the cancer research field is very interested in categorizing cells by their markers. Similarly, now that the research community recognizes that senescent cells accumulate with age and are harmful, an important contribution to age-relaed loss of function and disease, there is interest in distinct markers of senescence. Firstly, senescent cells are not uniform, and it may be useful to distinguish their types. Secondly, cell killing technologies that are highly selective for senescent cells are very much a desirable goal. Thirdly, the well established approaches to assess the burden of senescence in tissues are likely suboptimal in a number of ways.
The exploration of markers of senescence is a work in progress, with ongoing debate over the merits of one approach over another, particularly when it comes to the immune system. To come full circle, cellular senescence in the immune system appears important to immune system aging - but so are a range of other issues. The immune system is very complex, and far from fully mapped. There is a great deal of room for improvement to the present state of knowledge, and today's open access paper is an example of this sort of ongoing work on the topic of immune cell senescence and how to best identify this state.
Ageing is accompanied by a decline in immune function, associated with susceptibility to infections and malignancies, and reduced vaccine efficacy. These immunological changes, affect multiple components of the immune system, particularly T lymphocytes, which exhibit altered subset distributions and accumulate senescent features.
CD57, a surface glycoprotein expressed on T cells, has emerged as a potential marker of terminal differentiation and senescence used for immunomonitoring in infection or cancer contexts. However, the use of CD57 as a marker of T cell senescence remains unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed CD57 expression on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in healthy donors from two independent cohorts, considering cellular differentiation, age, cytomegalovirus status, and other senescence markers.
Our findings reinforce the association between CD57 expression, T cell differentiation, and cytomegalovirus seropositivity, but not with chronological age. Although CD57 is associated with altered proliferation and survival in all T cell differentiation subsets, it does not fully align with a senescent phenotype. Therefore, we propose that CD57 may be better appreciated as a marker of immunological age. Moreover, the interpretation of CD57 expression must account for cytomegalovirus serostatus to avoid misleading conclusions, especially in oncology and ageing research.